Logic and Reason
​
The First Cause: Following the Dominoes Backward
-
The Rule: Everything we see is caused by something else.
-
The Question: If we trace the chain backward, where does it stop?
-
The Flaw: Skeptics claim the chain stretches backward forever—but logic proves an infinite past is impossible.
Why the Universe Needs a Beginning
-
The Problem of Infinite Dominoes: Imagine watching a line of falling dominoes. If you ask what knocked over the last one, the answer is "the one behind it." But if the line is infinitely long, there is no first domino. If there is no first domino, the falling could never have started.
-
The "Counting to Zero" Paradox: Imagine trying to count down to zero starting from infinity. You would never arrive at zero. In the same way, if the universe had an infinite amount of yesterdays, we could never have arrived at "today."
-
The Reality of Today: Because we are here right now—reading this sentence—the chain of past events cannot be infinite. The dominoes must have had a definitive starting point.
The Inescapable Logic
For centuries, philosophers used this logic to prove the universe had a beginning. Today, modern astrophysics (the Big Bang) proves them right.
This leaves us with three simple, logical steps:
-
Whatever begins to exist has a cause. Nothing pops into existence out of absolute nothingness without a reason.
-
The universe began to exist. Science and logic both confirm that all space, matter, and time had a definitive starting point.
-
Therefore, the universe has a cause.
The Nature of the First Cause
Since the universe is the sum total of all nature, space, and time, it cannot cause itself to exist. The "First Finger" that knocked over the first domino must exist entirely outside the system.
-
To create space: It must be spaceless.
-
To create time: It must be timeless.
-
To create matter: It must be immaterial.
-
To create everything out of nothing: It must be unimaginably powerful.
This uncaused, timeless, immaterial, and powerful First Cause is what we call God.
​The Necessary Foundation (Why the universe can't explain itself)
​​
​The Trust in Reason (Why we can trust science and logic)
​The Necessary Foundation
Why is there something rather than nothing?
The Problem: Nothing physical explains its own existence.
-
Everything Is Temporary: Stars, trees, atoms, and people don't have to exist. They only exist because conditions allowed them to.
-
The Zero-Sum Chain: You cannot pay a debt by borrowing from someone with zero dollars. If everything in the universe borrows its existence from something else, where did existence come from?
-
The Bedrock: An endless chain of dependent things cannot hold itself up.
For anything to exist right now, there must be a foundation that depends on nothing else—permanent, uncaused, and self-sufficient.
The Trust in Reason
Can a mind made by accident trust its own thoughts?
The Conflict: Skeptics rely entirely on logic and science to argue against God. But if their view of the universe is true, our ability to reason is completely untrustworthy.
-
Survival vs. Truth: In a purely physical, godless universe, our brains evolved strictly for survival—eating, fleeing, and reproducing. Evolution cares about survival, not whether our abstract thoughts about reality are actually true.
-
Chemistry Isn't Logic: Shaking a bottle of soda produces fizz; it doesn’t produce rational truth. If your brain is merely a collection of chemical collisions and electric signals obeying blind physics, your thoughts are driven by chemistry, not logic.
-
The Self-Defeating Loop: If your brain is just an accidental machine programmed by blind physical forces, you have no logical reason to trust the thoughts it produces—including the thought that God doesn't exist.
-
The Rational Bedrock: For reason, math, and science to actually reveal objective truth, our intellect must stem from a rational Source. Reason requires a Mind behind reality.
​